Education
Study offer
Work-Study
Bordeaux Summer Schools
Admissions
How to register
Tuition fees
Keep track of your education
Support and success in your studies
Enrich and enhance your experience
Research
Scientific vision
Major Research Programmes (GPRs)
Impulsion Research Networks
Open Science
Ethics in research
Research organisation
Research departments
Boost your research
Innovation and the socio-economic sphere
Science and society
Innovation
Ambition
Partnerships
LabCom
Resources
Business premises
Campus
Discover the campus
Campus life and activities
Daily life
Social and financial aid
Sense of community & social cohesion
Culture
Sports
International
International ambition
International partners
Come to Bordeaux
International students
International PhD students
International lecturers, researchers and staff
Opportunities abroad
Student mobility
Partnerships abroad
About us
Get to know us
An outreaching, extended university
Our strategy
Our areas of activity
Our mechanisms
Our commitments
Environmental and social change
Organisation and operations
Training components
University employment
She/he/they make up the University of Bordeaux
Our Honoris Causa
Press corner
Most searched pages
Frequent search terms
Updated on: 06/07/2026
On the occasion of the 11th National Equality and Diversity Day in Higher Education and Research, which took place on 2nd July at the University of Bordeaux, Véronique Bertile, Vice-President for Equality, Diversity, and Inclusivity, discussed her priorities for her term in office. The law professor and researcher gave an account of the measures already in place, challenges that lie ahead, and future developments aimed at strengthening the struggle against all forms of violence and discrimination.
Véronique Bertile: This day, which is organised annually by the Ministry for Higher Education and Research, brings together people throughout France who are in charge of equality initiatives in higher education institutions. Hosting it in Bordeaux is a genuine recognition of the work that has taken place at our university over the past ten years and more. These meetings make it easier to share best practices, improve the systems at our disposal, and reflect together on the challenges that we have in common. The main theme of this edition was the struggle against gender-based and sexual violence, with a review of the first national plan for 2021–2025 and a discussion of future strategies.
V.B.: This is a significant development. Until now, questions of equality and matters relating to disability were dealt with by two separate policy officers. A decision was taken to combine these two areas of responsibility under the umbrella of a single dedicated vice-presidency. This reflects a strong policy commitment: to raise the profile of these issues, to devote more time to them, and to coordinate all the measures taken within the institution better.
I am also taking up my post at a very favourable time thanks to the remarkable work of my predecessors—Yamina Meziani for equality issues and Éric Dugas on disability, both of whom are recognised figures in these areas which are at the core of their research. Many systems are already in place and working. My role is not to start from scratch but to build on this momentum, adapt it to current needs and give it still more cohesiveness. My background as a lawyer naturally leads me to pay close attention to the legal framework, but these issues go far beyond the scope of the law. Above all, they have to do with human relations.
V.B.: The Counselling, Monitoring and Reporting Unit (CEVS) has shown itself to be a robust scheme for gathering the testimony of victims and witnesses of abuse, discrimination, and violence, but it still needs further improvement. In 2025, the unit recorded 97 reports relating to students. This figure seems very low given that the university has 55,000 students. Unfortunately, this does not mean that incidents of violence are rare; it shows above all that the people affected are not yet making enough use of the scheme. The challenge we are faced with is therefore twofold: to raise awareness of this unit and to boost confidence in its effective operation.
Where staff are concerned, last year the CEVS received around sixty reports. On closer examination, it becomes apparent that many situations initially qualified as harassment are in fact interpersonal conflicts which are better addressed through mediation or changes in the way work is organised (departmental reorganisation, changes of role). If the victim is willing to give up their anonymity, the most serious situations can lead to an investigation by the relevant department, and, where appropriate, disciplinary proceedings ranging from a simple reprimand to formal sanctions (a warning or official censure), or even a referral to the public prosecutor in the event of a criminal offence.
The unit offers confidential support through dedicated services, such as social workers or an external psychologist, and guarantees that victims receive independent assistance, especially if the case involves members of management teams. In cases where enhanced impartiality is required, certain investigations can be transferred and handed over to the local education authority.
Read more
V.B.: First of all, we have to reassure people who are hesitating to report a situation. Many students are afraid of having their identities revealed, of their professors or peers finding out what they have done, and that this could have a negative effect on their university careers—for example if they want to apply for a master’s degree later on. I want to be absolutely clear: this does not happen! We guarantee strict confidentiality. Making a report does not appear in your academic case file. Lifting of anonymity does not happen unless a person wishes it, and only in the context of essential procedures—for example when taking a matter to court.
We must also challenge the common misconception that ‘everyone knows everything’ in a university. This is not true: situations only come to light when they are reported. Similarly, we also have to fight against the belief that lecturers, heads of faculties or the vice-chancellorship will automatically protect a colleague who has been the subject of a report: that is not how it works. Proceedings are conducted with all due impartiality.
We must continue to promote freedom of speech. Violence often leads to trauma, which makes it difficult make a report an incident. Thankfully, greater awareness and the changing societal context are gradually contributing to removing these barriers. The aim is for everyone to know where to find help and to understand that there are designated contact persons who can offer them support.
V.B.: The university has now received nationwide recognition for its commitment to these issues. The dedicated teams do a tremendous amount of work, whether this involves supporting staff or students. Requests for adjustments to study plans (via the PHASE unit) or professional posts increase every year, which points both to an improved identification of needs and greater confidence in the support schemes on offer. The challenge is to continue to provide this individual support at the same as improving the accessibility of our community.
V.B.: This is a key issue on which we have still to make progress. As with many organisations, there are unconscious biases at play which may influence recruitment decisions or certain career paths. These are not intentional, but they have an effect nonetheless. We need to take measures to raise awareness and encourage people to report instances of discrimination, which also remain significantly under-reported even today. I am thinking, for example, of the numerous international students and PhD candidates, particularly from Africa, whom we welcome here. Enabling them to feel fully integrated is part of our role.
V.B.: The law of 31 July 2025 now requires all higher education institutions to establish a dedicated ‘equality unit’. In practical terms, this means that the various initiatives which today are spread across several departments will have to be brought together within a clearly defined organisational structure. This is an opportunity for the University of Bordeaux. We are going to make a policy more transparent which already exists today, albeit in a very cross-cutting form. In particular, this new unit will include a liaison officer whose post is entirely dedicated to combatting racism and antisemitism, as now stipulated by the regulations.
Our equality plan currently comprises around fifty highly varied initiatives. Some have to do with raising awareness, others with human resources, such as gender equality in the workplace. Still others focus on discrimination, inclusion or student life. We would also like to continue to diversify the formats on offer: conferences, public speaking competitions, cultural events, or the Inclusion Evening held in March every year, for instance. All these meetings allow us to reach different audiences and significantly raise awareness within our community.
V.B.: Equality, diversity, and inclusion affect each and every one of us. Our ambition is to ensure that every student, PhD candidate, and member of staff is able to thrive within a respectful, safe, and inclusive environment. The systems are already in place and will continue to evolve, but their effectiveness also depends on their being adopted by the whole university community. The more people know about them, the more we will collectively be able to prevent discrimination, support those affected, and put into practice the values upheld by the University of Bordeaux.
My background as a lawyer naturally leads me to pay close attention to the legal framework, but these issues go far beyond the scope of the law. Above all, they have to do with human relations.
Writer
anne.chaput%40u-bordeaux.fr